Make vs Zapier vs n8n

Make

Visual workflow automation platform with AI agents and drag‑and‑drop scenario building

Pricing

$0/mo başlangıç

Strengths

• High automation value
• Advanced visual builder
• Rich integration ecosystem

Limitations

• Pricing complexity
• Free tier limitations
• Polling inefficiencies

Key features

• Visual drag‑and‑drop workflow builder (scenario canvas)
• Support for routers, filters, iterators and error handling
• Credit‑based execution model (per module/step cost)
• Native AI Agents integrating LLMs (e.g., GPT‑4, Claude, Gemini)

Zapier

Automate workflows by connecting apps without code

Pricing

$0/mo başlangıç

Strengths

• Extensive app ecosystem
• Low-code/no-code usability
• AI-enhanced workflows

Limitations

• Task-based pricing unpredictability
• Free tier limitations
• Complex logic constraints

Key features

• Connects wide ecosystem of apps (7,000–9,000+) without coding
• Visual no‑code workflow builder with triggers and multi‑step actions
• Advanced logic capabilities including Filters, Paths, Looping, Delay, and Formatter
• Built‑in AI assistance such as Copilot and integration with AI models like ChatGPT

n8n

Open‑source workflow automation platform with AI agent capabilities and full data control

Pricing

$0 başlangıç

Strengths

• Unlimited free self‑hosting
• Execution‑based pricing
• Deep customization

Limitations

• Self‑hosting complexity
• Cloud pricing in euros
• Security vulnerabilities in the past

Key features

• Visual node‑based workflow builder with branching, looping, and support for sub‑workflows
• Execution‑based billing model (one workflow run = one execution, regardless of steps)
• Supports custom logic via JavaScript and Python code nodes
• Integrations with 400+ apps and API endpoints